I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
Rom Reis,
If you want to truncate the inactive portion of the Transaction Log of your
database, in SQL SERVER 2000 you use the following statement:
Backup Log DBNAME with TRUNCATE_ONLY
The " Dump Transaction " is a 6.x SQL Version Command.
Best Regards,
Paulo Conde?a.
"Tom Reis" wrote:
> I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
> other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
> supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
>
>
|||"Tom Reis" <reistom@.cdnet.cod.edu> wrote in message
news:%23aWjbJZCHHA.4892@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
>other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
>supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
DUMP TRANSACTION is still supported, but is deprecated. Define "doesn't
seem to work". Does the equivalent BACKUP command do anything differently?
sql
Showing posts with label documentation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label documentation. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
DUMP TRANSACTION
DUMP TRANSACTION
I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.Rom Reis,
If you want to truncate the inactive portion of the Transaction Log of your
database, in SQL SERVER 2000 you use the following statement:
Backup Log DBNAME with TRUNCATE_ONLY
The " Dump Transaction " is a 6.x SQL Version Command.
Best Regards,
Paulo Condeça.
"Tom Reis" wrote:
> I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
> other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
> supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
>
>|||"Tom Reis" <reistom@.cdnet.cod.edu> wrote in message
news:%23aWjbJZCHHA.4892@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
>other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
>supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
DUMP TRANSACTION is still supported, but is deprecated. Define "doesn't
seem to work". Does the equivalent BACKUP command do anything differently?
other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.Rom Reis,
If you want to truncate the inactive portion of the Transaction Log of your
database, in SQL SERVER 2000 you use the following statement:
Backup Log DBNAME with TRUNCATE_ONLY
The " Dump Transaction " is a 6.x SQL Version Command.
Best Regards,
Paulo Condeça.
"Tom Reis" wrote:
> I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
> other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
> supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
>
>|||"Tom Reis" <reistom@.cdnet.cod.edu> wrote in message
news:%23aWjbJZCHHA.4892@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
>other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
>supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
DUMP TRANSACTION is still supported, but is deprecated. Define "doesn't
seem to work". Does the equivalent BACKUP command do anything differently?
DUMP TRANSACTION
I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.Rom Reis,
If you want to truncate the inactive portion of the Transaction Log of your
database, in SQL SERVER 2000 you use the following statement:
Backup Log DBNAME with TRUNCATE_ONLY
The " Dump Transaction " is a 6.x SQL Version Command.
Best Regards,
Paulo Conde?a.
"Tom Reis" wrote:
> I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
> other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
> supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
>
>|||"Tom Reis" <reistom@.cdnet.cod.edu> wrote in message
news:%23aWjbJZCHHA.4892@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
>other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
>supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
DUMP TRANSACTION is still supported, but is deprecated. Define "doesn't
seem to work". Does the equivalent BACKUP command do anything differently?
other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.Rom Reis,
If you want to truncate the inactive portion of the Transaction Log of your
database, in SQL SERVER 2000 you use the following statement:
Backup Log DBNAME with TRUNCATE_ONLY
The " Dump Transaction " is a 6.x SQL Version Command.
Best Regards,
Paulo Conde?a.
"Tom Reis" wrote:
> I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
> other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
> supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
>
>|||"Tom Reis" <reistom@.cdnet.cod.edu> wrote in message
news:%23aWjbJZCHHA.4892@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I am running SQL 2000 SP4. I see the DUMP TRANSACTION command in BOL and
>other Microsoft documentation but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still
>supported. The command I am using is DUMP TRANSACTION WITH NO_LOG.
DUMP TRANSACTION is still supported, but is deprecated. Define "doesn't
seem to work". Does the equivalent BACKUP command do anything differently?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)